Re: PG 11 feature count

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 11 feature count
Date: 2018-05-18 14:49:30
Message-ID: 29407.1526654970@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Just yesterday Andres was telling us that pg11 has so much new stuff,
> when compared to 9.5 and 9.6, that seemed to have not as much shiny
> things. I think it's all in the eye of the beholder; our releases are
> large, and getting larger every year.

Yeah. My feeling for the last year or two has been that so much
development is happening that I can't keep track of it all.

Much of it is in the direction of "better performance", and I think
Bruce's opinion of what's a documentable feature is biased against
including that type of change. So that might account for some of
these numbers, too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-05-18 15:21:25 Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-05-18 14:46:37 Re: pg_basebackup -k option