Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-04 21:49:01
Message-ID: 28775.957476941@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Why does pg_group exist under $PGDATA though the indexes exist
> under each $PGDATA/base/db_name ?
> Could it be consistent on all databases ?

Oh my, I think you've got it! The indexes must be SharedSystemRelations!!

Backend 1 in database regression:

regression=# vacuum analyze pg_group;
VACUUM

Backend 2 in database other is also happy:

other=# vacuum analyze pg_group;
VACUUM

Now create a group with backend 1:

regression=# create group g;
CREATE GROUP

Backend 1 sees the index entries:

regression=# vacuum analyze pg_group;
VACUUM

But backend 2 doesn't:

other=# vacuum analyze pg_group;
NOTICE: Index pg_group_sysid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1).
Recreate the index.
NOTICE: Index pg_group_name_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME
AS HEAP' (1).
Recreate the index.
VACUUM

pg_shadow would have the same problem if it had indices, which I thought
it did but they seem to have been disabled.

Can you say "one more initdb"? I knew you could...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-04 22:09:35 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-05-04 21:13:18 RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt?