Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Why does pg_group exist under $PGDATA though the indexes exist
> > under each $PGDATA/base/db_name ?
> > Could it be consistent on all databases ?
>
> Oh my, I think you've got it! The indexes must be SharedSystemRelations!!
>
...
>
> pg_shadow would have the same problem if it had indices, which I thought
> it did but they seem to have been disabled.
>
> Can you say "one more initdb"? I knew you could...

You know, I am reading through this message, and thinking, gee, how is
he going to get out of this without initdb? Well I have my answer.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026