From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Date: | 2000-05-04 23:51:42 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005042050300.56194-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> But backend 2 doesn't:
>
> other=# vacuum analyze pg_group;
> NOTICE: Index pg_group_sysid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1).
> Recreate the index.
> NOTICE: Index pg_group_name_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME
> AS HEAP' (1).
> Recreate the index.
> VACUUM
>
> pg_shadow would have the same problem if it had indices, which I thought
> it did but they seem to have been disabled.
>
> Can you say "one more initdb"? I knew you could...
Would a pg_upgrade fix this, or do I have to do a whole dump/reload?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-04 23:53:48 | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-04 22:46:54 | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |