Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-04 23:51:42
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0005042050300.56194-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 4 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> But backend 2 doesn't:
>
> other=# vacuum analyze pg_group;
> NOTICE: Index pg_group_sysid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1).
> Recreate the index.
> NOTICE: Index pg_group_name_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME
> AS HEAP' (1).
> Recreate the index.
> VACUUM
>
> pg_shadow would have the same problem if it had indices, which I thought
> it did but they seem to have been disabled.
>
> Can you say "one more initdb"? I knew you could...

Would a pg_upgrade fix this, or do I have to do a whole dump/reload?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-04 23:53:48 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-04 22:46:54 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?