| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 |
| Date: | 2018-04-11 20:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | 284a4056-94c8-a6a2-4796-e033eb68e954@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/11/18 10:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
Well, toward the end of the cycle, when the list of closed items is
quite long, then it does become a bit of a burden to carefully cut and
paste the item in the little browser window without making hash of the
wiki page.
It's not a very large deal, but I doubt the result is very useful. The
current "resolved before 11beta1" section is pretty much useless.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-04-11 21:01:29 | Re: Fix for pg_stat_activity putting client hostaddr into appname field |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-04-11 20:58:00 | Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes |