| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 |
| Date: | 2018-04-11 21:01:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1330.1523480516@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 4/11/18 10:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
> Well, toward the end of the cycle, when the list of closed items is
> quite long, then it does become a bit of a burden to carefully cut and
> paste the item in the little browser window without making hash of the
> wiki page.
> It's not a very large deal, but I doubt the result is very useful. The
> current "resolved before 11beta1" section is pretty much useless.
Hm. There's definitely an argument to be made that it's not worth
tracking resolved items till after beta1. Once betas exist, the list
becomes useful to beta testers who may not be tracking events as closely
as hackers do.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-04-11 21:08:33 | Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-04-11 21:01:29 | Re: Fix for pg_stat_activity putting client hostaddr into appname field |