From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 |
Date: | 2018-04-12 06:11:20 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfAxRQrgrJhwibh2fi4KQOGLvQOWeg2Wk9pFWvmZMJAJw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 4/11/18 10:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
>
>> Well, toward the end of the cycle, when the list of closed items is
>> quite long, then it does become a bit of a burden to carefully cut and
>> paste the item in the little browser window without making hash of the
>> wiki page.
>
>> It's not a very large deal, but I doubt the result is very useful. The
>> current "resolved before 11beta1" section is pretty much useless.
>
> Hm. There's definitely an argument to be made that it's not worth
> tracking resolved items till after beta1. Once betas exist, the list
> becomes useful to beta testers who may not be tracking events as closely
> as hackers do.
>
+1
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-04-12 06:16:33 | Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11 |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-04-12 05:07:53 | Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP |