Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11
Date: 2018-04-11 14:53:28
Message-ID: 16875.1523458408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Do people find it useful to move the resolved items to a separate
>> section on the page, instead of just removing them? I'm not sure that
>> the resolved sections are useful, compared to just using the git log.

> If we have a section for resolved items, we can keep track of all
> items. If we just delete the resolved items, we wouldn't know if it
> was a mistake or it was intentional removal.

It's not that much work to move the items rather than remove them,
so I'd vote for keeping up the practice. It has some value in terms
of tracking activity.

What *does* take time is adding a link to the commit, so I'd happily
drop that step. As Peter says, you can usually look in the commit
log if you care.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-04-11 14:59:45 Re: 'make check' fails
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-11 14:50:47 Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery