From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix mdsync never-ending loop problem |
Date: | 2007-04-05 16:19:25 |
Message-ID: | 28272.1175789965@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to clean this up by creating a
> separate typedef for segment numbers, with its own special values?
Probably. I remember having thought about it when I put in the
FORGET_DATABASE_FSYNC hack. I think I didn't do it because I needed
to backpatch and so I wanted a minimal-size patch. Feel free to do it
in HEAD ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-05 16:25:49 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint V3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-05 16:15:00 | Re: Fix mdsync never-ending loop problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-05 16:25:49 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint V3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-05 16:15:00 | Re: Fix mdsync never-ending loop problem |