Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> I noticed that SERIAL sequences aren't dropping with the application of
> the patch.
> Was this intentional?
Yeah, the dependency isn't stored yet. I didn't like the way you did
that, and was trying to think of a better way...
More generally, a lot of dependencies that should be in place aren't
yet. I committed as soon as I had stable functionality that more or
less duplicated the former behavior; there's more patch still to review.
regards, tom lane