| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Memo on dropping practices |
| Date: | 2002-07-13 15:05:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1026572722.30427.159.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 10:27, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> > I noticed that SERIAL sequences aren't dropping with the application of
> > the patch.
>
> > Was this intentional?
>
> Yeah, the dependency isn't stored yet. I didn't like the way you did
> that, and was trying to think of a better way...
>
> More generally, a lot of dependencies that should be in place aren't
> yet. I committed as soon as I had stable functionality that more or
> less duplicated the former behavior; there's more patch still to review.
I eventually figured that out. I had only initially noticed a couple of
missing items which would have been easy to miss.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-07-13 15:08:21 | Re: Unique and Primary Key Constraints |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-13 14:33:02 | Re: 7.3 - current expectations for a release date |