Re: Memo on dropping practices

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memo on dropping practices
Date: 2002-07-13 02:51:54
Message-ID: 1026528721.30427.69.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 15:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that the pg_depend mechanism is mostly in there, it is no longer
> a good idea to delete things directly (for example, by calling
> heap_drop_with_catalog or even just heap_delete'ing a catalog tuple).

I noticed that SERIAL sequences aren't dropping with the application of
the patch.

Was this intentional?

I know I didn't have a way of carrying sequence information across a
dump (yet), but didn't think it would hurt to have.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-07-13 03:11:38 Unique and Primary Key Constraints
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-13 02:43:14 Re: Memo on dropping practices