Re: plpgsql test layout

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql test layout
Date: 2017-12-11 20:11:41
Message-ID: 27315.1513023101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/7/17 15:21, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2017-12-07 20:08 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
>> <mailto:peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>>:
>>> Here is a first attempt.

>> looks ok

> Any other thoughts on this? If not, I'd like to commit it, give the
> buildfarm a run at it (looking at the client code, it should be fine),
> and then rebase some ongoing work on top of it.

No particular objection. Does the MSVC infrastructure need to be
taught about it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2017-12-11 20:11:50 ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-12-11 20:07:20 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures