From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: plpgsql test layout |
Date: | 2017-12-11 19:55:16 |
Message-ID: | f1b16f71-e55f-6ca1-6085-b36b69873669@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/7/17 15:21, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2017-12-07 20:08 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> <mailto:peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>>:
>
> On 11/14/17 11:51, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > One option would be to create a new test setup under src/pl/pgsql(/src)
> > and move some of the test material from the main test suite there. Some
> > of the test cases in the main test suite are more about SPI and triggers
> > and such, so it makes sense to keep these in the main line. Of course
> > finding the cut-off might be hard. Or maybe we'll just start with new
> > stuff from now on.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > +1
>
> Here is a first attempt.
>
>
> looks ok
Any other thoughts on this? If not, I'd like to commit it, give the
buildfarm a run at it (looking at the client code, it should be fine),
and then rebase some ongoing work on top of it.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-12-11 20:07:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-12-11 19:53:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |