Re: pg_index.indislossy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_index.indislossy
Date: 2001-05-15 00:13:54
Message-ID: 26624.989885634@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is lossy and partial indexes the same?

No.

> I can't see how they were
> supposed to be used. The _only_ mention of this field I see in
> indexcmd.c, around line 132.

You missed a few then --- the most critical being in createplan.c.

AFAIK this is a working feature, and I am going to insist that you
keep your hands off it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message G. Anthony Reina 2001-05-15 00:21:29 Re: Installation on SGI IRIX 6.5.10
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 00:11:44 Re: Installation on SGI IRIX 6.5.10