From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_index.indislossy |
Date: | 2001-05-15 00:24:20 |
Message-ID: | 200105150024.f4F0OKp25526@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Is lossy and partial indexes the same?
>
> No.
>
> > I can't see how they were
> > supposed to be used. The _only_ mention of this field I see in
> > indexcmd.c, around line 132.
>
> You missed a few then --- the most critical being in createplan.c.
>
> AFAIK this is a working feature, and I am going to insist that you
> keep your hands off it ...
Really, it actually works? What are they?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 00:27:43 | Re: pg_index.indislossy |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 00:23:43 | Re: Installation on SGI IRIX 6.5.10 |