Re: pg_index.indislossy

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_index.indislossy
Date: 2001-05-14 23:57:56
Message-ID: 200105142357.f4ENvvk23867@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Should I remove this column?
>
> NO. The fact that we don't currently have any lossy index types doesn't
> mean that we won't ever have them again. I've been wondering, for
> example, whether the frequently heard requests for case-insensitive
> indexes might not be answerable by implementing 'em as lossy indexes.

Is lossy and partial indexes the same? I can't see how they were
supposed to be used. The _only_ mention of this field I see in
indexcmd.c, around line 132. All the other mentions are just passing
around parameters.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message G. Anthony Reina 2001-05-15 00:00:09 Re: Installation on SGI IRIX 6.5.10
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-14 23:53:19 Re: pg_index.indislossy