Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Date: 2018-01-04 21:53:27
Message-ID: 25b55513-749c-8cb6-d544-c4e177fd3351@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 1/4/18 16:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Some hosts don't seem to have X509_get_signature_nid(). Looking into
>> that ...
>
> dromedary is whinging about OBJ_find_sigid_algs, as well.

Yeah, it seems like we might need to fine-tune this a bit more to make
it work across all OpenSSL versions. I'm going to let the buildfarm
take a run through the current code and see what other issues arise.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-01-04 21:58:33 Re: GSoC 2018
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-01-04 21:48:23 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-01-04 22:12:41 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-01-04 21:17:06 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256