Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Date: 2018-01-04 21:17:06
Message-ID: 30240.1515100626@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Some hosts don't seem to have X509_get_signature_nid(). Looking into
> that ...

dromedary is whinging about OBJ_find_sigid_algs, as well.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-01-04 21:25:52 Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-01-04 21:09:53 Re: pgsql: Implement channel binding tls-server-end-point for SCRAM

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-04 21:53:27 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-04 20:56:32 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256