From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |
Date: | 2018-01-04 21:17:06 |
Message-ID: | 30240.1515100626@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Some hosts don't seem to have X509_get_signature_nid(). Looking into
> that ...
dromedary is whinging about OBJ_find_sigid_algs, as well.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-01-04 21:25:52 | Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-01-04 21:09:53 | Re: pgsql: Implement channel binding tls-server-end-point for SCRAM |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-01-04 21:53:27 | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-01-04 20:56:32 | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |