| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org? |
| Date: | 2016-10-16 19:54:28 |
| Message-ID: | 25683.1476647668@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> SPF is a different beast. We have SPF set up for most of our
> non-postgresql.org domains, but we've been hesitant to touch the actual
> postgresql.org domain until we have separate out the list namespaces. It
> *should* be safe, but we just haven't wanted to touch it until we were
> certain. At least that's my recollection of it, Stefan might have more
> details.
OK, as long as there's a plan. I'm going to whitelist postgresql.org
anyway, so it doesn't matter to me. It just seemed like publishing
an SPF entry is an important part of don't-look-like-a-spammer these
days.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2016-10-16 22:04:47 | Additional translations for presskit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-16 19:52:19 | Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org? |