Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org?
Date: 2016-10-16 19:52:19
Message-ID: 25430.1476647539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> I understand how SPF affects @postgresql.org addresses but I was under
> the impression that it was no help for mailing list traffic since it's
> being relayed so the ip address isn't going to match the records for
> the sending domain anyways.

No, I think you're confusing it with DKIM. SPF checks to see whether
the sending machine is an authorized IP address for the domain of the
envelope FROM address --- which'd be the list itself. For example,
the whine I'm getting about this message is

Received-SPF: none (sss.pgh.pa.us: domain of postgresql.org does not provide an SPF record) client-ip=217.196.149.56; envelope-from=sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us(at)postgresql(dot)org; helo=malur.postgresql.org;

The original sender having been stark(at)mit(dot)edu doesn't enter into it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-16 19:54:28 Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-10-16 19:39:09 Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org?