Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Clément Prévost <prevostclement(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Date: 2016-06-19 04:40:14
Message-ID: 24863.1466311214@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> With that, I think it would be preferable to undo the context-hiding
> dance in the tests, as in the attached patch, no?

Would this not result in unstable test output depending on whether the
code executes in the leader or a worker?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-06-19 06:15:21 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-06-19 03:34:54 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered