Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Clément Prévost <prevostclement(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Date: 2016-06-19 03:34:54
Message-ID: b99734a7-4e40-af77-054a-b6c1409d9ef1@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/17/16 9:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm comfortable with that. Feel free to make it so, unless you want
>> me to do it for some reason.
>
> Time is short, so I did this.

With that, I think it would be preferable to undo the context-hiding
dance in the tests, as in the attached patch, no?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
dont-hide-parallel-context.patch text/plain 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-06-19 04:40:14 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Previous Message Greg Stark 2016-06-19 02:12:40 Re: Whether to back-patch fix for aggregate transtype width estimates