| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Данил Столповских <danil(dot)stolpovskikh(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, d(dot)frolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru |
| Subject: | Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type |
| Date: | 2023-10-03 15:44:15 |
| Message-ID: | 2361020.1696347855@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> writes:
> On 10/2/23 20:07, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> FWIW I'm +1 on this patch,
> Thanks.
>> and with Tom on dropping the "yet". To me it
>> makes it sound like we intend to implement it soon (fsvo).
> I am not fundamentally opposed to it, nor to any other wordsmithing the
> committer (probably Tom) wants to do. The main point of the patch is to
> list at least some of the problems that need to be solved in a correct
> implementation.
Pushed with a bit more work on the text.
I left out the regression test, as it seems like it'd add test cycles
to little purpose. It won't do anything to improve the odds that
someone finds this text.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2023-10-03 15:49:22 | Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-10-03 15:03:22 | Re: trying again to get incremental backup |