Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Данил Столповских <danil(dot)stolpovskikh(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, d(dot)frolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type
Date: 2023-10-03 00:21:21
Message-ID: 954bf3d2-e78c-fd80-14c7-17e554c96302@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/2/23 20:07, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> writes:
>
>> No one except you has said anything about this patch. I think it would
>> be good to commit it, wordsmithing aside.
>
> FWIW I'm +1 on this patch,

Thanks.

> and with Tom on dropping the "yet". To me it
> makes it sound like we intend to implement it soon (fsvo).
I am not fundamentally opposed to it, nor to any other wordsmithing the
committer (probably Tom) wants to do. The main point of the patch is to
list at least some of the problems that need to be solved in a correct
implementation.
--
Vik Fearing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-10-03 00:39:09 Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2023-10-03 00:10:48 Re: Add support for AT LOCAL