Re: trying again to get incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date: 2023-10-03 15:03:22
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob4aK4+hw8RXcE_ME5JeGv99zpTD_29M9YNZJzz0Or51A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:30 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > No objections to 0001/0002.
>
> Cool.

Nobody else objected either, so I went ahead and committed those. I'll
rebase the rest of the patches on top of the latest master and repost,
hopefully after addressing some of the other review comments from
Dilip and Jakub.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-03 15:44:15 Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-10-03 14:26:31 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby