Re: Current CVS parallel test lock

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Current CVS parallel test lock
Date: 2005-03-09 14:22:21
Message-ID: 23369.1110378141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> Do you have a way to revert to the old installation to check whether
> the checks fail again? It might be useful to track down exactly
> what happened. It seems wrong that a currently-installed version
> should have adverse effects on a just-built version's regression
> tests.

We've seen that happen many times with shared library dependencies
... but libpq hasn't changed in the last few days AFAIR.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-03-09 15:17:45 Re: Current CVS parallel test lock
Previous Message Nicolai Tufar 2005-03-09 12:40:24 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail