Re: Current CVS parallel test lock

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Current CVS parallel test lock
Date: 2005-03-09 15:17:45
Message-ID: 422F1399.5060004@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>Do you have a way to revert to the old installation to check whether
>>the checks fail again? It might be useful to track down exactly
>>what happened. It seems wrong that a currently-installed version
>>should have adverse effects on a just-built version's regression
>>tests.
>
>
> We've seen that happen many times with shared library dependencies
> ... but libpq hasn't changed in the last few days AFAIR.

I hadn't done a gmake install for months due to being overseas...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql 2005-03-09 15:38:27 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-09 14:22:21 Re: Current CVS parallel test lock