Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib
Date: 1998-10-18 23:11:11
Message-ID: 22720.908752271@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
> 1) Is there any reason why I can't create a unique index on an int8?
> It tells me this:
> ERROR: Can't find a default operator class for type 20.

int8 is new and not very thoroughly supported yet. Probably there
just isn't support for making an index on it (Thomas?).

> 2) Are there any more changes expected in the code for libpq?

Ever? Yes. Before 6.4 release? Perhaps not, but I wouldn't swear to
it. We are at a bug-fixes-only stage of the release cycle, but I do not
promise there are no bugs in libpq.

Why do you care, exactly? You shouldn't need to worry whether a
library you use is changing internally, as long as the API is stable
(and I certainly hope we do not find bugs that force an API change
at this point...)

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1998-10-18 23:23:49 Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 1998-10-18 21:42:34 unique indexes and pqlib