From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib |
Date: | 1998-10-18 23:11:11 |
Message-ID: | 22720.908752271@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
> 1) Is there any reason why I can't create a unique index on an int8?
> It tells me this:
> ERROR: Can't find a default operator class for type 20.
int8 is new and not very thoroughly supported yet. Probably there
just isn't support for making an index on it (Thomas?).
> 2) Are there any more changes expected in the code for libpq?
Ever? Yes. Before 6.4 release? Perhaps not, but I wouldn't swear to
it. We are at a bug-fixes-only stage of the release cycle, but I do not
promise there are no bugs in libpq.
Why do you care, exactly? You shouldn't need to worry whether a
library you use is changing internally, as long as the API is stable
(and I certainly hope we do not find bugs that force an API change
at this point...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1998-10-18 23:23:49 | Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1998-10-18 21:42:34 | unique indexes and pqlib |