Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib
Date: 1998-10-18 23:23:49
Message-ID: XFMail.981018192349.vev@michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 18-Oct-98 Tom Lane wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>> 2) Are there any more changes expected in the code for libpq?
>
> Ever? Yes. Before 6.4 release? Perhaps not, but I wouldn't swear to
> it. We are at a bug-fixes-only stage of the release cycle, but I do not
> promise there are no bugs in libpq.
>
> Why do you care, exactly? You shouldn't need to worry whether a
> library you use is changing internally, as long as the API is stable
> (and I certainly hope we do not find bugs that force an API change
> at this point...)

I'm doing the libpq and psql ports for OS/2.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Searchable Campground Listings http://www.camping-usa.com
"There is no outfit less entitled to lecture me about bloat
than the federal government" -- Tony Snow
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-18 23:28:56 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in keywords.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-10-18 23:11:11 Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib