Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib
Date: 1998-10-19 07:07:45
Message-ID: 362AE541.E87A72A9@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > 1) Is there any reason why I can't create a unique index on an int8?
> > It tells me this:
> > ERROR: Can't find a default operator class for type 20.
> int8 is new and not very thoroughly supported yet. Probably there
> just isn't support for making an index on it (Thomas?).

I'll try to look at it. But I'm starting to get swamped with last-minute
big additions to the documentation, and will have only limited time for
other stuff.

btw, I haven't looked yet but I hope the odbc makefile stuff still can
build standalone. Hopefully we are converging on an acceptable set of
Makefiles; I'd made changes recently - which you'd noticed broke
installations which did not do major.minor version numbering on shared
libraries - in response to major breakage introduced for some other
reason which damaged installations _with_ major.minor version numbering.
Though despite appearances my response wasn't intended to rebreak the
other systems :/

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Ridderbusch 1998-10-19 08:38:52 Missing define F_OIDEQ in Sundays snapshot
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1998-10-19 06:17:03 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with interfaces/ecpg/lib/Makefile.in in PostgreSQL 6.4.