Re: Quality of email postings

From: "Mike Ellsworth" <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings
Date: 2007-08-10 11:13:18
Message-ID: 219951fd0708100413v1e51fe97rbcf3baef1a0bfaca@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 8/10/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > See my other posting about suggestions to improve things. Obviously I
> > > realize this is open source and lots of issues are going to come up,
> but
> > > the question is whether there is room for improvement and whether more
> > > leadership and self-policing will improve things.
> >
> > Well "leadership" in this vein is a red herring unless you want to start
> > moderating. Self policing is something that we *all* should do better.

The provided description of Advocacy is: "PostgreSQL vs. the rest.
Promotional ideas, etc.",
and would seem to be a good place to start. Change 'description' to
Objective. Restate the sentence as an Objective. Set specific, chewable,
sub-objectives. Then add in the Promotional ideas to achieve each specific
objective. Develop very specific task lists (similar to a Roadmap). Get
volunteer(s). Then do it and attempt to measure results.

Anytime I see "etc." in any sentence, to me it means "wing it". I brought
up the same general thread a few years ago. There is no Marketing Plan.
Until there is, the Advocacy list will remain an exercise in "etc.". At the
time I was told (+ - ), "don't go there."

Man 1: "Can you give me some directions?"
Man 2: "Sure, what's your destination?"
Man 1: "Damned if I know."
Man 2: "There's your answer.".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-08-10 13:32:33 Re: Quality of email postings
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2007-08-10 10:55:35 Re: Quality of email postings