From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Quality of email postings |
Date: | 2007-08-10 13:46:34 |
Message-ID: | 46BC6C3A.6090500@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> On 8/10/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> See my other posting about suggestions to improve things. Obviously I
>>>> realize this is open source and lots of issues are going to come up,
> Anytime I see "etc." in any sentence, to me it means "wing it". I brought
> up the same general thread a few years ago. There is no Marketing Plan.
> Until there is, the Advocacy list will remain an exercise in "etc.". At the
> time I was told (+ - ), "don't go there."
>
> Man 1: "Can you give me some directions?"
> Man 2: "Sure, what's your destination?"
> Man 1: "Damned if I know."
> Man 2: "There's your answer.".
You are very, very close :). The difference is, there is more than one
driver.
Joshua D. Drkae
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGvGw5ATb/zqfZUUQRAgUUAJ9Qk2pESMbMEtWKSL6HUwGD/TNNtQCfTHFW
FBsDLfISWq8mXFRF/PJFAig=
=cwLE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-10 13:47:32 | Re: Quality of email postings |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-10 13:44:02 | Re: Quality of email postings |