Re: Quality of email postings

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quality of email postings
Date: 2007-08-10 13:46:34
Message-ID: 46BC6C3A.6090500@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> On 8/10/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> See my other posting about suggestions to improve things. Obviously I
>>>> realize this is open source and lots of issues are going to come up,

> Anytime I see "etc." in any sentence, to me it means "wing it". I brought
> up the same general thread a few years ago. There is no Marketing Plan.
> Until there is, the Advocacy list will remain an exercise in "etc.". At the
> time I was told (+ - ), "don't go there."
>
> Man 1: "Can you give me some directions?"
> Man 2: "Sure, what's your destination?"
> Man 1: "Damned if I know."
> Man 2: "There's your answer.".

You are very, very close :). The difference is, there is more than one
driver.

Joshua D. Drkae

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGvGw5ATb/zqfZUUQRAgUUAJ9Qk2pESMbMEtWKSL6HUwGD/TNNtQCfTHFW
FBsDLfISWq8mXFRF/PJFAig=
=cwLE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-10 13:47:32 Re: Quality of email postings
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-10 13:44:02 Re: Quality of email postings