Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question
Date: 2000-02-07 23:36:53
Message-ID: 21733.949966613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Now, how to convert these? Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> pg_dump supplies the ops. Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> releases. Comments?

Actually, rather than hacking gram.y, it seems like it would be cleaner
to put the kluge in whatever part of the parser looks up the ops name.

Of course a kluge is a kluge no matter what...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-02-07 23:38:46 RE: [HACKERS] TODO item
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-07 23:34:59 Re: [HACKERS] TODO item