Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Now, how to convert these? Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> > pg_dump supplies the ops. Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> > we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> > releases. Comments?
>
> Actually, rather than hacking gram.y, it seems like it would be cleaner
> to put the kluge in whatever part of the parser looks up the ops name.
>
> Of course a kluge is a kluge no matter what...

I like it in gram.y because it is more visible there and easier to
remove later.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026