Re: [HACKERS] TODO item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item
Date: 2000-02-07 23:34:59
Message-ID: 21700.949966499@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Is it still valuable to solve this item in current spec ?

I'd be inclined to forget about it for now, and see what happens
with WAL. It looks like a fair amount of work for a problem that
will go away anyway in a release or so...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-07 23:36:53 Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-07 23:32:51 Re: fsync alternatives (was: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item)