Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM
Date: 2001-08-03 16:20:50
Message-ID: 20680.996855650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> What I think? That this entire discussion wasted far too much
> time already.

I agree. VACUUM FULL is what's in the code and docs today, and I
haven't heard any good reason to expend the effort to change it...
none of the other proposals are visibly better, merely different.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Horst Herb 2001-08-03 16:37:32 redo log
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2001-08-03 16:15:11 Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM