| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM |
| Date: | 2001-08-03 16:15:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200108031615.f73GFBU04116@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > VACUUM DEFRAG?
> > VACUUM COMPRESS?
>
> While these look kinda ugly to me, I can find no stronger objection than
> that. (Well, maybe I could complain that these overstate what old-style
> vacuum actually does, but that's even weaker.) What do other people
> think?
What I think? That this entire discussion wasted far too much
time already. These commands live usually in crontabs and
aren't typed in that often. So give the baby "a name" and
done. VACUUM CLASSIC and VACUUM LIGHT or whatever.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-03 16:20:50 | Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-03 16:04:14 | Re: Name for new VACUUM |