Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
Date: 2025-04-25 09:02:07
Message-ID: 202504250902.mbwr3bfqp3vz@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Apr-23, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> This one was briefly discussed in an RMT meeting.
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 01:16:20PM +0800, jian he wrote:
> > attached patch is for address pg_dump inconsistency
> > when parent is "not null not valid" while child is "not null".
>
> I see an open item [0] that points to this patch, but there's no owner
> listed, and there doesn't appear to have been any follow-up discussion.
> Álvaro, should I list you as the owner, and if so, are you planning to look
> at it soon?

Hello, yes, please list me as owner, and now at least there's a patch I
feel more comfortable with :-) I'll leave it there for a couple of days
for Jian and Rushabh to comment.

Thanks,

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-04-25 09:02:57 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2025-04-25 05:15:39 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication