| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-25 09:02:57 |
| Message-ID: | aAtPwZdeWtlA8Gz2@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Jacob Champion
> I think the system is overconstrained at that point. If you want to
> support clients that delay-load the ABI they're compiled against,
> _and_ have them continue to work seamlessly after the system has
> upgraded the ABI underneath them, without restarting the client... is
> there any option other than side-by-side installation?
My point is that we should be trying to change the ABI-as-coded-in-the-
filename as rarely as possible. Then side-by-side should not be required.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-04-25 09:08:51 | Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2025-04-25 09:02:07 | Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints |