Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
Date: 2025-04-23 16:18:20
Message-ID: aAkSzCpXEB9hVsXX@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This one was briefly discussed in an RMT meeting.

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 01:16:20PM +0800, jian he wrote:
> attached patch is for address pg_dump inconsistency
> when parent is "not null not valid" while child is "not null".

I see an open item [0] that points to this patch, but there's no owner
listed, and there doesn't appear to have been any follow-up discussion.
Álvaro, should I list you as the owner, and if so, are you planning to look
at it soon?

[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_18_Open_Items

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-04-23 16:24:46 sslmode=secure by default (Re: Making sslrootcert=system work on Windows psql)
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-04-23 16:13:17 Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals