From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Printing window function OVER clauses in EXPLAIN |
Date: | 2025-03-10 06:08:39 |
Message-ID: | 202503100608.ktmgfoerjfqs@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Mar-09, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > What are your thoughts on being a bit more brief with the naming and
> > just prefix with "w" instead of "window"? Looking at window.out, I see
> > that the EXPLAIN output does become quite a bit wider than before. I
> > favour the idea of saving a bit of space. There is an example in
> > src/sgml/advanced.sgml that has "OVER w", so it does not seem overly
> > strange to me to name them "w1", "w2", etc.
>
> OK by me, any objections elsewhere?
WFM.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-03-10 06:12:02 | Re: Parallel heap vacuum |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2025-03-10 05:45:04 | Re: Orphaned users in PG16 and above can only be managed by Superusers |