Re: [plpython] Add missing volatile qualifier.

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Xing Guo <higuoxing(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [plpython] Add missing volatile qualifier.
Date: 2024-04-01 18:29:20
Message-ID: 20240401182920.GA2299671@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 11:57:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Xing Guo <higuoxing(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm playing a toy static analysis checker with PostgreSQL and found a
>> variable is missing volatile qualifier.
>
> Good catch! It looks like the consequences of a failure would be
> pretty minimal --- AFAICS, no worse than a possible failure to remove
> a refcount on Py_None --- but that's still a bug.

Huh. I seem to have dropped that "volatile" shortly before committing for
some reason [0].

> I don't care for your proposed fix though. I think the real problem
> here is schizophrenia about when to set up pltargs, and we could
> fix it more nicely as attached. (Perhaps the Asserts are overkill
> though.)

Your fix seems fine to me.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/20230504234235.GA2419591%40nathanxps13

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-04-01 18:39:05 Re: [plpython] Add missing volatile qualifier.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-01 18:09:37 Re: Statistics Import and Export