Re: pg_checksums?

From: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_checksums?
Date: 2023-10-30 10:03:09
Message-ID: 20231030100309.qepfu2hir2ewfggb@hjp.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2023-10-29 13:26:27 -0500, Ron wrote:
> On 10/29/23 12:57, Paul Förster wrote:
> > Safe in the sense that, if I enable checksums on a replica, switch
> > over and the enable checksums on the other side, if this is ok, or
> > whether future mutations on the primary will corrupt the replica.
>
> Trying it would tell you something.
>
> > That's why I asked if I need to perform a patronictl reinit.
>
> Best to ask Percona.

Why Percona?

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message yangsr3411 2023-10-30 11:07:07 Fw: Server process exited with exit code 4
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2023-10-30 10:01:13 Re: pg_checksums?