Re: pg_checksums?

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_checksums?
Date: 2023-10-29 18:26:27
Message-ID: 76e7a32e-f433-41fa-9b03-96efdb3a5223@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/29/23 12:57, Paul Förster wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
>> On Oct 29, 2023, at 16:37, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> As for safety, what do you mean by "safe"?
> Safe in the sense that, if I enable checksums on a replica, switch over and the enable checksums on the other side, if this is ok, or whether future mutations on the primary will corrupt the replica.

Trying it would tell you something.

> That's why I asked if I need to perform a patronictl reinit.

Best to ask Percona.

--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2023-10-29 21:06:48 Re: Differences between database objects (tables, triggers, sequences, functiions) and a sql file
Previous Message Paul Förster 2023-10-29 18:01:43 Re: pg_checksums?