Re: pg_checksums?

From: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_checksums?
Date: 2023-10-30 10:01:13
Message-ID: 20231030100113.l2fzg7x3ukvce2l7@hjp.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2023-10-30 09:56:31 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hm? Page checksums are written when a page is flushed to disk, we
> don't set them for dirty buffers or full-page writes included in WAL,
> so it should be OK to do something like the following:
> - Stop cleanly a standby.
> - Run pg_checksums on the standby to enable them.
> - Restart the standby.
> - Catchup with the latest changes
> - Stop cleanly the primary, letting the shutdown checkpoint be
> replicated to the standby.
> - Promote the standby.
> - Enable checksums on the previous primary.
> - Start the previous primary to be a standby of the node you failed
> over to.

I stand corrected.

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter J. Holzer 2023-10-30 10:03:09 Re: pg_checksums?
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2023-10-30 09:53:38 Re: [SOLVED?] Re: Disk wait problem... not hardware...