From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 |
Date: | 2023-05-19 23:04:38 |
Message-ID: | 20230519230438.e6rskh3yjz3mutm2@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-05-19 15:44:09 -0700, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:01 PM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have two more runs of the benchmark in progress so we will have 3
> >> results for each of the test cases to confirm that the small regressions
> >> are repeatable.
> >>
> >
> I repeated the benchmark a few times using a more recent PG16 build (git
> sha 08c45ae2) and have yet to see any significant changes. So that is good
> news. My testing scripts have been improved so I should be able to finish
> the next round of tests in less time.
With "yet to see any significant changes" do you mean that the runs are
comparable with earlier runs, showing the same regression? Or that the
regression vanished? Or ...?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-19 23:05:12 | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-19 22:57:17 | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |