Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16

From: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Date: 2023-05-19 22:44:09
Message-ID: CAFbpF8McZjnR0NAu5m7EpSHrEhBNsq+mwHKH1ZauUvZ-uQM95g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:01 PM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I have two more runs of the benchmark in progress so we will have 3
>> results for each of the test cases to confirm that the small regressions
>> are repeatable.
>>
>
I repeated the benchmark a few times using a more recent PG16 build (git
sha 08c45ae2) and have yet to see any significant changes. So that is good
news. My testing scripts have been improved so I should be able to finish
the next round of tests in less time.

--
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-05-19 22:57:17 Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2023-05-19 22:01:11 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER