| From: | MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 |
| Date: | 2023-05-20 21:32:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAFbpF8NyOiw=aJ5RsRTeUJNKf=erqCEvYPENeSDMDN8YsuJm5A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 4:04 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> With "yet to see any significant changes" do you mean that the runs are
> comparable with earlier runs, showing the same regression? Or that the
> regression vanished? Or ...?
>
I mean that I might be chasing noise and the mean+stddev for throughput in
version 16 pre-beta so far appears to be similar to 15.2. When I ran the
insert benchmark a few times, I focused on the cases where 16 pre-beta was
worse than 15.2 while ignoring the cases where it was better. Big
regressions are easy to document, small ones not so much.
Regardless, I am repeating tests from both the insert benchmark and
sysbench for version 16 (pre-beta, and soon beta1).
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-05-20 22:01:33 | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2023-05-20 18:33:19 | Re: Adding SHOW CREATE TABLE |