| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: i.e. and e.g. |
| Date: | 2022-07-21 04:22:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20220721.132235.298293911620024485.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 21 Jul 2022 10:20:30 +0700, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote in
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 3:40 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > By the way, I forgot about back-branches. Don't we need to fix the
> > same in back-branches?
>
> The intent of the messages is pretty clear to me, so I don't really see a
> need to change back branches. It does make sense for v15, though, and I
> just forgot to consider that.
Ok, I'm fine with that. Thanks!
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-07-21 04:23:16 | Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-07-21 04:20:12 | Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages |